A
cyclist makes her way along a pedestrian street
lit with Christmas decorations in central Brussels
at dusk on Monday, Nov. 23, 2015. Three days of
the highest terror alert and unprecedented measures
have closed down the city's subways, schools,
and main stores, creating a very different atmosphere
as the Belgian capital tries to avoid attacks
similar to the ones that caused devastating carnage
in Paris. |
The cowardly attacks by ISIS terrorists in the heart
of Europe continue to raise more questions than answers.
Common sense demands that describing
the attackers as “Muslim terrorists” is
a gross insult to the roughly 1.6 billion Muslim faithful
who want nothing to do with the perverted interpretations
brought forward by ISIS Jihadists.
As a matter of fact, reports
confirm that at least 89 of the victims killed or seriously
injured in the Paris attacks were Muslims.
While Paris 2015 is being described
as Europe’s 911, fears—both rational and
irrational—continue to spread across the continent,
fears that are now fueling the agenda of some politicians,
including some powerful extremists who seem to believe
that every European citizen is a potential terrorist
and thus must be monitored 24/7.
It is fair to observe that
the airline business—the mode of transport most
vulnerable to terrorist plots and attacks—may
at this point need to rethink various factors for enhancing
overall safety, including well-trained and appropriately
paid security staff that take pride in what they do
and how they do it.
That would, it can be gently
suggested, include the outsourcing of safety and security-related
functions such as air passenger and baggage security
checks, cargo security checks, cargo and baggage handlers,
and passenger check-in staff.
Interestingly in Germany, where
calls for security action and tougher laws are all rising
in volume, it appears there is a glaring failure to
vote into law the implementation of the ICAO TI, the
worldwide binding legal framework for the transport
of dangerous goods by air.
No doubt in this age of heightened
awareness and fear, failure to pass ICAO TI into applicable
German law is a clear and present risk both to safety
and security.
The
USA Model?
While in the
United States of America individual states have their
own laws and regulations, Federal law governs crucial
subjects of national importance such as immigration,
security, and transport matters. After the attacks of
September 11, 2001, security in the United States was
focused on coordinated efforts that worked on a nationwide
scale.
Although far from perfect,
American security measures post 911 are good models
that can be adapted by our European compatriots.
Moving forward, a hopeful sign
for the European Union is the emergence of this long-term
thought: rather than closing intra-European borders,
a better, safer strategy would focus on more unification
of security measures within the EU and less nation-state
rhetoric.
Jens |