Vol. 11 No. 67                                                                                                            Tuesday July 17, 2012 


 

     Opened in 1914, the Panama Canal immediately revolutionized global trade by allowing ships to move freely between the Pacific and Atlantic oceans without traversing around the southern tip of South America.

     On its centenary two years from now, the Canal will have a similarly profound impact on international trade options when a third lane and new locks are completed, enabling some of the world’s largest vessels to ply its waters.
     “The Panama Canal expansion is a game changer that will have a positive impact on all regions, particularly those with adequate infrastructure capable of capitalizing on the competitive advantages provided by larger vessels and economies of scale,” said Argelis Moreno de Ducreux, Liner Service Segment Leader at the Panama Canal Authority.
     The expansion is quite an endeavor—a $5 billion-plus one, in fact. New locks at either end of the Canal will add a deeper, wider third shipping lane suitable for ‘post-Panamax’ ships.
     The current lanes allow ships up to 20-foot equivalent 5,500-unit (TEU) capacity to transit. According to shipbuilder Samsung Heavy Industries, Post-Panamax container vessels of 366m in length, 48.2m-beam and carrying up to 13,200 TEU will be able to transit the new locks.
     The impact on bulk carrier and tanker trades will also be immense. The largest dry bulker that can transit now is 85,000 deadweight tonnes dwt. In 2014, this will rise to 180,000 dwt, which will allow the carriage of 140,000 tonnes of cargo within the new draft limit.
     The impact of this jump in vessel size that can transit the Canal will be far reaching. New ports, inland depots, railways, and ships are already being built to maximize usage of the locks.
     “With the expanded Canal the competitiveness of the route increases, thus reaching new markets by increasing the Panama Canal’s area of influence,” said De Ducreux. “Some cargo may divert from other means of transportation, but overall, less transportation costs per unit of cargo and reliability of the service will determine the real impact of the expansion project.”
     U.S. ports have set aside almost $9 billion to upgrade their facilities and deepen channels to receive the larger vessels. David Host of U.S. shipbroker T. Parker Host said recently that the U.S would have 285 million tonnes of export capacity in place by 2015, and more than 300 million tonnes if Gulf midstream operations were counted.
     West coast ports, which traditionally receive the bulk of consumer goods shipped from Asia in containers, will need to up their game to compete against rivals on the US Gulf and East coast or risk losing cargo. If they succeed, better, faster services on the West coast to interior destinations could impact marginal air trades where shippers are able to wait a few extra days for delivery.
     Booming demand for coal and iron ore from China—aided by bargain basement freight rates—has already seen huge increases in exports of coal from the U.S. and Colombia and iron ore from Brazil in recent years.      Once the new locks open, these suppliers will become even more competitive in Asian markets in comparison to alternatives sources, such as Australia and Indonesia.
     “Given the expected increasing demand in China, in particular, we envision that coal cargoes from the U.S. and Colombia will take the most advantage of larger vessels,” said María Eugenia de Sánchez, Drybulk Segment Leader at Panama Canal Authority. She added that iron shipments from northern Brazil and Venezuela to China were also expected to benefit from increased Canal capacity.
     Latin America countries will also see their trade options greatly increase and costs fall, assuming of course that Canal tolls do not become too onerous.
     The big question mark for how far reaching the locks impact will be on global trade will be the level of tolls. After such a huge investment, Panama needs to increase its revenue from the Canal. But in June, the Panama Canal Authority bowed to pressure from shipping lines and postponed a raft of new toll increases to give the industry more “lead time” to prepare for higher costs.
     Transits of the Panama Canal by dry bulk carriers totaled 3,285 in fiscal year 2011, ahead of container ships as the most frequent user of the Canal by vessel type. However, the container market segment remains the most important, contributing more than 50 percent of the tolls and 35 percent of total cargo.
SkyKing

 


     Time and again, rising cargo volumes at India’s metro airports have created questions about congestion at the cargo terminals. To add to the problem, the lack of infrastructure has produced road connectivity issues. It is not that stakeholders did not raise connectivity and congestion problems: in Mumbai and Delhi, forwarders, exporters, and many others connected with airfreight had protested. Now, however, air cargo stakeholders as well as the Ministry of Civil Aviation have been seriously toying with the idea of setting up air freight stations (AFS) away from the airports.
     The concept of the AFS was, in fact, tried out in Chennai way back in 2007. One such station was established at the Central Warehousing Corporation in Virugambakkam (around 15 km from the Chennai international airport). The AFS, or off-airport cargo processing facility, had to be abandoned because the airport operator believed that it would lose revenue from the storage and handling if air cargo were processed at an off-airport location.
     That, however, was an erroneous belief from the past; erroneous, because some of the country’s ports have experienced success using off-port container freight stations (CFS). Air cargo stakeholders are now pointing out the CFS experience with a simple demand: establish similar stations for air cargo. The ball was set rolling almost simultaneously in Chennai and Mumbai. While the Chennai Port Trust decided to set up an AFS near the airport in the public-private partnership mode on the 2.13 acres of land it owns barely two kilometers from the Chennai airport, in Mulund East near Mumbai, an AFS was launched.
     Set up by the Cargo Service Center in partnership with CONCOR (Container Corporation of India), the AFS, according to Chief Customs Commissioner Vineet Kumar, would change the way air cargo business is done in the country. For the first time, the AFS would offer exporters and forwarders the opportunity to have their cargo processed through Customs without the necessity of going to the congested airport. The AFS has the capacity to handle 70,000 tons of cargo and would be able to relieve Mumbai airport’s cargo terminal. Cargo traffic at Mumbai airport has been on the rise: between April 2011 and March 2012, the air cargo complex handled around 500,000 tonnes of cargo. There is very little space within the complex and this often results in long traffic snarls.
     Perhaps, what is more important is the fact that the Mulund AFS is conveniently located. It is easily accessible from the industrial centers of Pune and Nasik. Said Radharamanan Panicker, (left) “Our Air Freight Station (AFS) at Mulund (Mumbai) is a new breakthrough in the air cargo Industry. AFS has evolved through the concept of minimized multiple handling thus reducing the resultant damages. The AFS at Mulund is cost effective, efficient and permits an increased reach to airports.” As an integrated link, Panicker mentioned that the AFS was the better alternative for customers who can avail the services through a facility that is closer to their industrial bases, enabling a reduced dwell time.
     The Mulund AFS is one of the five such air freight stations that have been planned in the country and air cargo stakeholders hope that when all five are ready and operational, air cargo will be cleared faster and in a more systematic manner. According to Air Cargo Agents Association of India’s (ACAAI) G. Raghu Shankar, (right) “the air cargo fraternity and the country failed to take advantage of AFS. Our airport cargo terminals face space constraints and shortage of equipment and manpower. An AFS can solve all these problems and enhance turnaround times.”
     In fact the working group that had been set up by the Ministry of Civil Aviation to suggest measures for the enhancement of the air cargo logistics industry, in its recent report had emphasized on the establishment of AFSs. The group had even gone on to suggest that the major hurdle – permitting Customs to work 24x7 -- in the operation of AFS be removed. Citing the example of Chennai port’s container operations – it has around 30 CFSs around the city’s suburbs – it urged the Ministry of Civil Aviation to emulate the concept and set up AFSs.
     Other influential groups like ASSOCHAM (Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India) have also asked Ajit Singh, the Minister of Civil Aviation, to upgrade the present airport infrastructure. In fact, ASSOCHAM submitted an action plan to help the civil aviation sector from the current financial crisis.      In addition to enhancing infrastructure, the plan has pointed out that it was essential for the sector to grow annually by eight percent and raise freight traffic in the next ten years from its present 2,300,000-odd tons to 7,000,000 tons. The ASSOCHAM action plan details setting up of AFSs in the hinterland to decongest warehouses at airport terminals and these should have facilities for palletization, Customs examination, and X-ray screening.
Tirthankar Ghosh

 

     As reported by All India Radio today, July 16, United Arab Emirates shipped its first oil cargo from its Fujirah Oil Export Terminal on Sunday, bypassing the Strait of Hormuz.
     The first shipment carried the equivalent of 500,000 barrels of oil to Pakistan pumped through the Abu Dhabi crude pipeline.
     The move will reduce the UAE’s dependence on shipping its oil exports through the Strait of Hormuz amidst threats of its closure.
     UAE Oil Minister Mohammed bin Dhaen al-Hamli said the strategic project provides options to its clients to transport larger quantities of oil.
     This step is expected to make the other projects viable in the area, reduce the insurance costs, and give access to the open seas.
     The oil export terminal has the capacity to pump up to 1.5 million barrels per day, which is almost 70 percent of UAE’s total exports of 2.5 million barrels a day. It has eight crude oil storage tanks each with a capacity of one million barrels. The bulk of UAE oil exports are routed to Asia, and India is the third largest importer.
     The 370-km Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline carries oil from the Habshan oilfields in the western desert to Fujairah, which is a major oil storage and fuel-bunkering hub on the east coast.
     The move is significant in the wake of warnings from Iran to close the Strait of Hormuz over the sanctions.
     Nearly 20 percent of the global oil supplies through the sea are routed through the Strait of Hormuz.
Ted Braun

 

Get On Board Air Cargo News FlyingTypers
For A Free Subscription
Click Here To Subscribe

 

RE:  Court Nixes Schenker Price Fix
Geoffrey:
     Does this decision make any sense whatsoever? That airlines can group together as a cartel; over-bill their customers; be found guilty and pay massive fines/penalties to governments around the world, BUT their customers (effectively, the forwarders) are not able to file civil claims to recover these over-charges?
     Do you believe that the European Court of Justice would use the same logic when shippers file civil claims with the forwarders in this—and other—cases of overcharging?
     I believe most definitely NOT!
Regards,
Andy
Andrew Titley, Managing Director
Albion Group of Companies
www.AlbionGroup.com


If You Missed Any Of The Previous 3 Issues Of FlyingTypers
Click On Image Below To Access

FT070912

FT071212