The
news as sent out from the
London-based Naresh Goyal’s
Jet Airways and Abu Dhabi’s
Etihad this past Wednesday
April 24, 2013, was clear.
What
was a matter of conjecture
is now fact: the two carriers
have forged a strategic alliance
under India’s Foreign
Direct Investment (FDI) policy.
According
to the alliance, the UAE national
carrier has agreed to subscribe
for 27,263,372 new shares
in Jet Airways at a price
of Rs 754.74 ($14) per share.
The
value of the equity investment
totals $379 million and will
result in Etihad Airways holding
24 percent of the enlarged
share capital of Jet Airways.
Etihad
Airways’ wider overall
commitment to Jet Airways
includes the injection of
$220 million to create and
strengthen a wide-ranging
partnership between the two
carriers.
As
part of this, Etihad Airways
paid $70 million to purchase
Jet Airways’ three pairs
of Heathrow slots through
the sale and lease back agreement
announced on February 27,
2013.
An
amount of $150 million would
be invested by Etihad Airways
by way of a majority equity
investment in Jet Airways’
frequent flyer program, ‘Jet
Privilege,’ subject
to appropriate regulatory
and corporate approvals and
final commercial agreements,
which are expected for completion
within the next six months.
Under
the strategic partnership,
which is subject to full regulatory
and shareholder approval,
the airlines will gradually
expand existing operations
and introduce new routes between
India and Abu Dhabi, providing
“an ever wider choice
to the travelling public.”
They
will combine their network
of 140 destinations, with
Jet Airways establishing a
Gulf gateway in Abu Dhabi
and expanding its reach through
Etihad Airways’ growing
global network.
The
release pointed out that passengers
from 23 cities in India would
benefit from direct connections
to international destinations.
New flights from Jet Airways’
home hubs and metro airports
would further strengthen its
current operations from these
airports.
Etihad
Airways President and Chief
Executive Officer, James Hogan,
and the Chairman of Jet Airways,
Naresh Goyal unveiled details
of the investment. Hogan said:
“We
are certain the partnership
(with Jet) will bring significant
benefits and opportunities
for global growth to both
airlines.
“It
is expected to bring immediate
revenue growth and cost synergy
opportunities, with our initial
estimates of a contribution
of several hundred million
dollars for both airlines
over the next five years.”
He
also said that the Indian
market was fundamental “to
our business model of organic
growth partnerships and equity
investments.
“This
deal will allow us to compete
more effectively in one of
the largest and fastest-growing
markets in the world.”
For
his part, Jet chief Naresh
Goyal thanked the government
of India, especially the Ministries
of Civil Aviation, Commerce
and Industry, and Finance,
“for having the foresight
to introduce the historic
reform of allowing foreign
direct investment into civil
aviation in India. Infusion
of FDI in the domestic sector
will result in the improvement
of the economics of aviation,
grow traffic at our airports,
and create job opportunities.”
The
deal with Etihad, said Goyal,
would “further strengthen
the balance sheet of Jet Airways
and, more importantly, underpin
future revenue streams, which
will accelerate our return
to sustainable profitability
and liquidity.”
The
deal would have been accepted
without protests but for the
fact that Jet demanded a huge
number of seats to Abu Dhabi.
In
early April this year, Jet
Airways wrote a letter to
the Ministry of Civil Aviation
seeking a huge increase in
the bilateral entitlements
in favor of Abu Dhabi from
the present 13,300 seats to
nearly 54,000 seats each week,
along with connection to 23
additional Indian cities.
Former Minister and presently
a member of the Parliamentary
Standing Committee on Tourism
and Transport, Dinesh Trivedi,
shot off a letter to Prime
Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh,
voicing his “sense of
concern and sadness, looking
at the bleak future of our
national carrier Air India.”
He
went on to state that Jet
had asked for an additional
40,000 seats per week to Abu
Dhabi.
“If
such an increase is allowed
to happen, the total seat
entitlement between India
and Abu Dhabi will go up to
a whopping 110,000 seats per
week,” Singh said.
“The
creation of Emirates' specific
capacity entitlements, coupled
with unbridled access to all
major cities in India for
the airlines of the UAE, has
already resulted in Dubai
establishing itself as the
primary hub for Indian traffic.
“Already
Emirates Airline is being
called the ‘national
airline’ of India, as
it operates more flights and
carries more passengers to/from
India than Air India, our
national carrier.
“More
than 70 percent of the passengers
carried by Emirates Airlines,
however, travel to points
beyond Dubai on Emirates’
network.
“Now,
Abu Dhabi is also keen to
emulate the success of Dubai
and Emirates Airline, and
is keen to establish Abu Dhabi
as another hub airport on
the back of Etihad Airways,
and for this reason is aggressively
seeking an increase in capacity
entitlements,” Dinesh
said.
|
India
is struggling to create a
world-class hub at Delhi,
faced as it is with competition
from airports like Dubai and
Doha in the Gulf and Bangkok,
Hong Kong, and Singapore in
South East Asia, and despite
leading airports like Delhi
and Mumbai having been privatized.
While
Delhi and other private airports
along with the Government
of India have made huge investments
in upgrading infrastructure
and building new, world class
terminals, they are hampered
by the competition posed by
these well-established hubs
and their aggressive mega
carriers.
Allowing
Abu Dhabi to come up as another
hub, which is only about three
hours flight away from the
major Indian metros, will
kill all aspirations that
India may nurture as a nation
to establish a world class
hub.
Around
the same time as the letter
from Trivedi, the Civil Aviation
secretary K. N. Srivastava
convened a meeting of all
stakeholders comprising domestic
airlines and airport operators,
both state-owned and privately-managed.
To
start with, domestic airport
operators, particularly GMR
operating Delhi and Hyderabad
and GVK operating Mumbai and
Bengaluru, conveyed their
very strong objections to
the Jet/Etihad deal.
They
said it would severely compromise
the position of Indian airports
as possible hubs—mainly
Delhi and Mumbai.
They
said together an investment
has been made of $7 billion
dollars on these airport upgrades
and modernization.
Looking
ahead, the word is that the
intention is to spend more
on the second and, perhaps,
third phases.
All
this would frustrate their
efforts and completely neutralize
their finances.
They
reminded the Ministry of Civil
Aviation of what Prime Minister
Dr. Manmohan Singh had stated
in July 2006 while inaugurating
the modernized Delhi International
Airport. He had said:
“We
created a hub for India in
Dubai, allowing Emirates so
many rights to India.”
The
airport operators added, “If
the demand for seats was granted,
Abu Dhabi would become the
second hub for India.”
The
Prime Minister had then said
India must develop its own
airport hub in Delhi.
To
top it all, at the beginning
of the year, Air India CMD
Rohit Nandan sent a warning
note to the government and
the Ministry of Civil Aviation.
Reacting
to the 49 percent FDI by foreign
carriers in Indian domestic
carriers, Nandan said if the
government did not penetrate
new destinations, agree to
demands for Sixth Freedom
rights, or ferry Indian passengers
onwards from hub airports,
business to Dubai and Singapore
would logically rise.
Incidentally,
the government did not respond
to the Air India chief’s
note.
As
the situation stands today,
40 percent of the total Indian
international traffic is routed
through the Gulf, with Emirates,
Etihad, and Qatar handling
the lion’s share of
traffic.
During
2011-12, Emirates’ market
share of passengers from India
to foreign destinations was
13.04 percent.
When asked for specific comments,
Air India said the current
entitlement of 13,300 seats
could be increased by 2,400,
while low cost carriers IndiGo
and SpiceJet said it would
go up by 5,000 and 5,900 respectively.
None
said they thought that number
should rise by a whopping
40,000 seats.
The
Indian government has gone
a step further than the 40,000
and enhanced the number of
seats between India and United
Arab Emirates to 50,000.
In
the bilateral talks that were
held recently, the UAE had
urged India to allocate an
additional 40,000 seats per
week, and grant Goa, Pune,
Amritsar and Lucknow as additional
destinations.
The
government sent out word as
the news about the Jet-Etihad
broke that India was looking
at the negotiations in the
“overall economic interest
of India and government’s
policy of liberalization for
attracting foreign investment
in India, including the civil
aviation sector.”
India
had requested the UAE side
to grant change of gauge facility
at Abu Dhabi to Indian carriers
in addition to ensuring full
Fifth Freedom rights from
the UAE.
As
per the present Air Service
Agreement, the designated
carriers of both sides have
an existing entitlement of
13,330 + 2 percent flexibility
(total 13,600) seats per week,
with 11 points of call available
to UAE.
Both
sides agreed to allocate an
additional entitlement of
36,670 seats per week spread
over a period of three years:
11,000 seats per week in year
2013, 12,800 seats per week
up to the winter schedule
2014 and 12,870 seats per
week up to the winter schedule
2015. Both sides also agreed
to extend third country and
domestic codeshare facility.
The
release went on to point out
that the Indian side had not
agreed to the request of the
UAE for any additional points
of call and removal of cap
in terms of seats/frequency
from each point of call.
The
deed has been done.
We
will have to wait and see
if the move will lead to the
immediate closure of Air India,
for which Civil Aviation Minister
Ajit Singh had lobbied hard
to get a Rs 30,000 crore ($5,540
million) turnaround plan and
of which Rs 5000 crore ($923
million) has already been
spent.
Tirthankar
Ghosh
|