| 
      They 
          used to entice prospective buyers of Packard automobiles, which were 
          the standard of 1930s motoring luxury in USA, by saying: “Ask 
          the Man Who Drives One.”So here at the top are a couple of reactions 
          to that CNS Mini Conference held last week in Arlington, Virginia that 
          FlyingTypers received from some people who paid to be there.
 
 
  Gregg Borgeson (left) of Ex Works, Inc. 
          said: “I thought it was an excellent conference. Well-qualified 
          speakers on a broad variety of topics, all tying into air cargo compliance. “I learned a great deal, particularly 
          about the enlightened attitude and approach of various government regulatory 
          agencies toward fines and penalties.
 
  “CNS 
          and Mike White did a very nice job with this conference.” George Baglieri, (right) Senior Manager 
          Operations & Compliance Americas, Swiss WorldCargo adds:
 “For me, not only was the content 
          useful and informative, but the conference (and the promise to repeat 
          the venue) reestablished the IATA/CNS commitment to act as an intermediary 
          between the various
 government agencies and the carrier community here in the U.S.
 “Among the many informative presentations, 
          one that sticks out in my mind is the pilot for a combined initiative 
          between the TSA and CBP to obtain additional advanced data directly 
          from forwarders.
 “It's a refreshing approach to see 
          these agencies finally look for data from the source, and not burden 
          the carrier community with supplying data they don't own.
 “I would definitely attend again. 
          I would like to see the possibility to hold an additional carrier-only 
          session to discuss SSI (Sensitive Security Information) topics directly 
          with the TSA.”
 A solid 50-plus attendees came together on a 
          frigid February morning in Arlington, VA for the first CNS mini conference 
          of the year. The successful combination of current day issues, high-level 
          speakers and an overall very well managed and moderated event make this 
          an easy winner. It could turn out to be a tough act to follow.
 
  Mike 
          White, (left) CNS’s Assistant Director of Cargo Standards and 
          Facilitation is that rare air cargo professional who incorporates depth 
          and breadth of industry matters with an easy going, approachable manner. 
          The choice of presenters covered the entire compliance spectrum, from 
          security to commerce, foreign trade, compliance, customs and cargo data. 
          Having representatives from the airlines, freight forwarders, trucking, 
          ground handlers, automation providers and government agencies made for 
          an effective exchange of information and ideas that the global supply 
          chain has to stay on top of every day. If I have one complaint, it’s the unending 
          alphabet soup of Washington insiders; acronyms tossed around incessantly. 
          Here is a sampling for which I hope we can one day offer a glossary: 
          CSA, IACSSP, STA, IACMS, OMB, TSA, CBP, ACE, ITDS, IMO, WCO, ITN, ICS, 
          ENS, ATD, ISF, HTS, ATS/ACAS, AES, NTC, QP/QX, CCSP – and I probably 
          missed a few! Has this made your eyes water yet?
 You have to be and remain an optimist to weave 
          your way through the sheer size of this ball of wax and the volumes 
          of freight involved. Brandon Fried, the Executive Director of the Airforwarders 
          Association, counted 4,250 freight forwarders in the U.S. registered 
          with the TSA. Sandra Scott, Senior Director Compliance at SEKO Worldwide 
          and a walking institutional encyclopedia, mentioned 106 government agencies 
          that deal with international freight matters. John McGowan, Sr. VP Border 
          Security with Sandler & Travis Trade Advisory Services, said 44 
          percent of all consumer products in this country are imported and represent 
          75 percent of unsafe product recalls.
 To get this air freight to and from the airports, 
          there are more than 2,000 trucking companies serving 107 airlines operating 
          25,000 flights a month in the U.S., with seven million air waybills 
          monthly, importing from 194 countries with exports carried on passenger 
          aircraft processed by 1,170 screening facilities. This qualifies as 
          a big country in which government, law enforcement and the private sector 
          coexist despite constant challenges, changing regulations and a delicate 
          balancing act between regulatory and customer requirements, which often 
          conflict. Some respect is in order.
 According to Jason Hooks with British Airways 
          World Cargo, airlines operate in one of the most heavily regulated environments 
          in the world – no kidding! What IATA and other trade associations 
          pushed for years has picked up speed when governments waved the magic 
          wand of mandates for security reasons. What seemed impossible became 
          yesterday’s deliverable and we haven’t slowed down a bit; 
          to the contrary, there is more complexity and complications and very 
          long global supply chains, growing cargo volumes, a multitude of intermediaries 
          and agents affecting everything from processes to the quality and timeliness 
          of the data air cargo delivers day in and day out. Rather impressive!
 It’s human nature to focus on the many 
          things that are less than perfect in this world, starting with a lack 
          of institutional understanding of what cargo is and the constant battle 
          to educate Washington and prevent kneejerk overreaction, which could 
          destroy the industry. What stood out was how little mention there was 
          of the actual cause for all these vast security regimes. A close second 
          is that it is accepted and so much effort, resources, time and money 
          is spent to combat the elusive terrorist mind.
 The world changed on 9/11 and in its aftermath 
          wave after wave of new measures were put in place and progress was being 
          made. Then came a lone (or not) person in Yemen on October 29, 2010 
          and the entire carefully erected security edifice was stripped of its 
          impenetrability in one fell swoop. Since then the ‘known shipper’ 
          will likely need to evolve to the ‘trusted shipper,’ although 
          according to Todd Owen, Director of Cargo Security and Conveyance at 
          CBP, 70 percent of inbound air cargo is express, i.e., not the typical 
          airline/forwarder, commercial shipper community which already has various 
          screening procedures in place. It’s kind of strange that the focus 
          is always on cargo carried on passenger aircraft, even when evidence 
          to the contrary is staring you in the face, as was the case here. Perhaps 
          the express carriers have better lobbyists in Washington who manage 
          to keep it under wraps and out of the headlines.
 Yes, in response to the new threat a joint CBP/TSA 
          effort has emerged, the Air Cargo Targeting Group, which is working 
          with industry to develop an initiative to – I paraphrase - “move 
          the borders back” and mitigate risk without adverse impact of 
          the economy and stakeholders; a lofty, imminently sensitive goal. What 
          it means is a pilot that has been underway for a while and started shortly 
          after the incident, using a subset of standard shipment data to report 
          to CBP/TSA well in advance of flight departure to the US from airports 
          in the Middle East and North Africa. Running this information through 
          the Advance Targeting System for threat assessment positions the agencies 
          to act rather than react to high-risk shipments that are a relatively 
          small portion of the total volume with minimal impact on the industry.
 This Air Cargo Advance Screening (ACAS) is located 
          at the National Targeting Center (NTC) and is based on receiving data 
          from the entity that has the shipment at the earliest stage in the shipping 
          process; most likely, this is the forwarder. Much work is being done 
          to the extent possible on establishing the messaging between the parties 
          using existing transmission pipelines in order to avoid overwhelming 
          information technology systems.     The procedural 
          concepts and resolution protocols are yet to be defined, including how 
          the “OK,” “DO NOT LOAD” and the “Need 
          more information” categories will be transacted and translated 
          into operational terms.
 The way CBP/TSA and the industry associations see it, these are proactive 
          steps aimed at both addressing a problem while also calming down regulators’ 
          nerves and convincing them to refrain from tabling draconian measures, 
          which could bring about a collapse of the supply chains. CBP/TSA has 
          its specialists in 97 countries around the world, working in conjunction 
          with the State Department and Commerce. Global harmonization of air 
          cargo screening is a daunting task that allows some hope that reason 
          will prevail by applying a risk-based, multi-layered security approach 
          the trade advocates, rather than the regulators’ envisioned vast, 
          systematic, 100 percent-of-everything apparatus that the TSA uses in 
          passenger screening.
 Despite best efforts, (and this conference was 
          a testimony to the fact that CBP/TSA are working closely with industry, 
          which is a huge positive) it takes around 24 months to develop and roll 
          out a systemic response to a past threat. The old adage here is that 
          the bad guys only need to succeed once and, as the Yemen improvised 
          device amply demonstrated, they are getting more sophisticated all the 
          time. So it’s a deadly, asymmetrical catch up game of massive 
          proportions, which costs the developed world gigantic resources it can 
          ill afford. As long as the price of inconveniencing your own population 
          and making the global supply chains much more challenging than they 
          need to be is lower than facing up to and dealing with the real threat 
          effectively, politicians will stay the course.
 While of a different dimension, a case in point 
          is the impending lithium batteries controversy; although there’s 
          anecdotal but no scientific evidence, several incidents, including the 
          UPS 747 freighter crash in Dubai have been attributed to these batteries. 
          A DOT Final Rule is under review at the OMB; the rulemaking would prohibit 
          the transportation of primary lithium batteries and cells as cargo aboard 
          passenger-carrying aircraft and would apply to both foreign and domestic 
          passenger-carrying aircraft entering, leaving, or operating in the United 
          States. It is hoped that a rigorous cost-benefit-analysis will reveal 
          that such a regulation would make the U.S. less competitive, and this 
          in a time of a highly unstable economy. Reconcile that with the president’s 
          National Export Initiative and its Control Reform measures which among 
          others, aims to increase U.S. jobs by increasing the number of companies 
          exporting and expanding the number of markets current U.S. companies 
          sell to.
 A lot of invaluable information condensed 
          in two days and the parade of high level government officials on hand 
          and in the know ready to address and discuss current matters resulted 
          in a well-received conference. Watch this space for more details.
 Ted Braun
 |